Table of Contents
Why good kids make bad choices
Stages of moral development explained
“Why is he behaving like this?”, “what’s got into her?” How often have you been beside yourself trying to figure out your child! Understanding the stages of moral development shines light on what truly motivates your child’s behaviour. Understanding these stages can transform your parenting, resulting in raising children who develop a strong moral compass.
Every parent wants their child to ultimately do the right thing for the right reasons, to be motivated at least some of the time, by integrity, care and compassion, not just self-interest. Parents want their child to have confidence but also humility, to develop positive emotional and social skills, yet have the courage to question social norms. To support, and avoid inadvertently thwarting, our child’s optimal moral development, it’s important to examine our parenting approaches with these stages of moral development in mind.
By the end of this article you’ll have likely gained valuable insights into your child’s development. This clarity can greatly help you to support your child’s progression of their moral reasoning. I’ll explain the model, then walk you through a relatable example.
The six stages of moral development
The late American psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg developed a framework for the stages of moral development that has continued to be the most influential theory in developmental and moral psychology. Kohlberg showed that moral reasoning becomes progressively more values based, nuanced and less dependent on external authority or consequences as people mature. A fascinating finding in his research was that 85 – 90% of adults continued to operate at the lower stages of development throughout life. This widespread arrested development undoubtedly explains so many of our social and political problems.
Gaining clarity about what’s reasonable to expect from children makes it easier to support children to up-level. Sadly, children are too often shamed and punished for normal, developmentally appropriate behaviour. In working with countless parents, I see huge reductions in conflict and defiance when parents learn to set their child up for success.
Stage 1: Fear of punishment
At stage one, children do what they’re told for fear of getting in trouble. Right and wrong is determined by whether behaviour gets punished or rewarded; “I don’t hit my brother because dad would get angry at me.” The motivation is entirely external and self-protective. While fear can motivate obedience, it also motivates them to avoid detection. Fear doesn’t motivate children to consider the impact on their brother.
In motivating children through fear, be it punishments, timeouts or raised voices, we keep them stuck in the lower levels. They learn to consider “will I get caught?” rather than “what’s the right thing to do?” When adult supervision disappears, so does good behaviour. Not only do punishments or rewards (the stick and the carrot) not motivate children to care about their sibling, they’ll likely resent him for crying out to the parent.
Stage 2: Rewards and self-interest
Children at this stage are motivated by self-interest; they’ll tidy their room to get screen time. Rewards and praise are often presented as positive alternatives to punishment. However, motivating children with rewards can undermine their intrinsic motivation to complete tasks for the personal satisfaction of achieving the task or doing the right thing.
In “Punished by Rewards,” Alfie Kohn presents studies that show children offered rewards for tasks involving problem-solving or creativity tend to produce lower quality work than those offered nothing. When rewards, whether screen time or stars, become the goal, they diminish the inherent value of the action itself. We want the dopamine hit to come from achievement rather than acquiring the reward.
Stage three: Social approval and peer pressure
As children grow, their circle expands to include peers, teachers, and their broader social world. At this level, behaviour is motivated by wanting to be liked, belong to the group and seen as “good” by others. “I don’t want my friends to think I’m mean”.
This stage leads to developing social skills and considering the needs, boundaries and expectations of others. While it’s a critical stage, it’s still a fragile foundation for morality. They haven’t yet internalised a sense of right and wrong independent of others’ opinions and approval.
Children motivated primarily by social approval are vulnerable to peer pressure. Unless they start to develop higher levels of reasoning, kids, especially teens, are vulnerable to actions that are immoral or risky for the sake of fitting in.
Stage four: Following rules, authority and maintaining social order
At this stage, children move beyond simply avoiding criticism, gaining rewards or the approval of the group to valuing the importance of structure, routines, agreements and rules. This level represents an important development in understanding and willingly contributing to social order and includes respect for the wisdom and guidance of leaders, be they parents, teachers or other authority figures. They develop values for fairness, contribution and responsibility. They may independently reference rules or family agreements.
However, children who don’t progress beyond this level may struggle to think critically about rules that are unjust or enforced by those abusing their authority. People who don’t progress past this level can struggle to act morally in situations where no clear rule or agreement exists. They may blindly follow authority, even if asked to do something harmful. Following authority blindly has proven to be a dangerous phenomena. With authority comes power and power doesn’t always bring out the best in people, especially when the authority figure has not developed their higher levels of moral development.
Level Five: Social contract and democratic values
At this higher level of moral development, people begin to develop their own moral code based on values like fairness, compassion, mutual respect and critical thinking. They understand that while rules are necessary, they can and should be questioned when they conflict with higher moral principles. They recognise that context matters when determining right from wrong. They learn that determining right from wrong and decision making are complex rather than simplistic. They develop more tolerance and curiosity for the views and perspectives of others even if their actions seem “wrong”.
They develop abilities in critical thinking through researching and hearing all sides of debates on complex issues. To have nuanced understanding, they learn that they need to reflect on and listen to their own inner wisdom. They learn that to do the right thing is more complex than doing what their peers do, following the leaders, or following the rules and the laws. As Haim Ginott puts it; “Blind obedience to authority can lead to the greatest atrocities, while thoughtful disobedience can be the highest form of loyalty to humanity.”
Level Six: Universal ethical principles and integrity
This level is a progression from the process of deep thinking, reflecting, researching and questioning that happens in level 5. It represents the highest level of moral development, where behaviour is guided by deeply internalised ethical principles and values. People at this level act according to their conscience and personal integrity, even when it’s difficult, unpopular, embarrassing or goes against authority. They ask, “What kind of person do I want to be?” or “What does my integrity require of me in this situation?” They’re no longer simply motivated by self-interest, being liked or accepted by others, they are willing to do that which is for the greater good, whatever that may mean to them. These people tend to be driven by a sense of purpose, conscience and a higher good. Examples would be a parent …..
It’s in developing this higher moral compass that allows people to find their way back to a better path when they’ve been led astray.
Why kids break rules and lie
The party cupcakes are set aside for later. Five year old Tom sneaks one knowing it’s not allowed. The adult asks who took the cupcake, all fingers point to Tom. When Tom is confronted, he hangs his head and denies everything, despite frosting on his face!
The adult lectures Tom about fairness, waiting and honesty while the other children are praised for being good and honest. The adult genuinely believes they’re helping Tom reflect and learn. Through the lens of moral development, we see that the adult is expecting Tom to operate from stages 4 – 6 (respecting rules, respecting the social contract of the group, values of fairness, honesty and integrity). Yet a typical 5 year old is only capable of stages 1 and 2 reasoning, self-interest, taking the cake and lying to avoid punishment.
The “reward brain” is incredibly strong at this age, while impulse control is very low. These forces are not yet tempered by higher moral reasoning. The more understanding and empathy we have for children’s limitations, the easier it is to not feel angered or offended.
Indeed, Kohlberg’s research suggests that only around 10 to 15 percent of adults consistently reason at levels 5 and 6..
Why didn’t the other children sneak a cupcake?
They resisted the temptation for the same reasoning that motivated Tom to lie: fear of punishment and criticism. They’re not little stage 4 – 6 saints maintaining law, order, and integrity, they’re just more afraid than tempted in that moment. When fear of punishment activates the child’s stress response, some children are more likely to fight or flight, some more likely to freeze.
All children in this situation are good children whose behaviour is developmentally normal. Shaming, moralising, punishments or comparisons do nothing to help children reflect or learn moral reasoning. It simply instills fear and shame, keeping children stuck at these lower levels and encourages dishonesty.
The long game
Supporting children to be motivated by integrity rather than fear or reward requires patience, skill and deep reflection. When your kid doesn’t want to apologise, it’s tempting to force the issue. But a coerced apology teaches that words are performances rather than genuine expressions. But when we patiently allow children to share their feelings and perspectives, we hold space for them to self-reflect and better understand their feelings and with time, they learn to identify their motivations and their needs.
The goal isn’t perfect obedient children living in fear of punishment, but children who are lovingly guided to develop their capacity to reflect on their actions, consider their impact on others, and gradually build their own internal guidance system. This takes years, not days.
Supporting moral growth
Real growth happens when we maintain warm connection and acknowledge what happened without judgment. When children are reactive, our response should be connection and curiosity, not consequences. Get down to their level: “I know you really wanted the toy, this is so hard! I can’t let you snatch, but let me help you both figure this out.”
Explain that agreements and rules help to maintain safety and harmony. When broken, revisit and remind without anger or threats. Punishments distract from the actual consequences of actions.
Without shaming or pressure, you can ask questions that activate their own instincts to learn; “what could you kids do better the next time?” or “what would have worked better?” This develops empathy and problem-solving skills. As Alfie Kohn says, “Kids learn to make good decisions by making decisions, not by following directions.”
A child motivated by internal values might question your decisions or push back when something seems unfair, but that’s actually a sign of healthy moral development.
Your calm non-judgmental support lays the foundation for their growth. And modeling connection, compassion, kindness, loving boundaries and fairness in how you speak to them provides the most powerful teaching of values and morality.
Originally written for The Natural Parent Magazine
Genevieve Simperingham is a Psychosynthesis Counsellor, a Parenting Instructor and coach, public speaker, human rights advocate, writer and the founder of The Peaceful Parent Institute. Check out her articles, Peaceful Parenting eCourses, forums and one-year Peaceful Parenting Instructor Training through this website or join over 90,000 followers on her Facebook page The Way of the Peaceful Parent or @peacefulparentinstitute on Instagram